Opioid Restrictions Versus Patient Needs

Tags: ,

The thinking behind recent opioid restrictions

Opioid Restrictions Versus Patient NeedsThere are two sides to arguments behind recent efforts at opioid restrictions in the U.S. However one side has been dominant in the last couple of years. State and federal governments have enacted opioid restrictions in an attempt to reduce misuse of prescription medications. Options for patients with severe pain have not been the focus of these campaigns.

The U.S. Surgeon General, Vivek Murthy, has made a call to action over what he calls the “addiction crisis in America.” Dr. Murthy addressed the “public health problem” in a recent podcast interview with the British Medical Journal. He said that prescription painkillers “feed into” the heroin epidemic and he called for a broad culture change in approach to drugs. For this reason he initiated the Turn the Tide Campaign in 2016. Murthy also highlighted the role of clinicians in addressing the problem by “sharpening prescribing practices” to prevent overdoses.

In the podcast, most of Dr. Murthy’s comments were directed toward legal issues, overdose and addiction treatment, and stigma attached to drug misuse disorders. While prevention and treatment of addiction are important problems, I wondered at how little he spoke of the problem of severe pain that opioid medications are manufactured to address in the first place.

Thankfully, BMJ published a patient opinion as well, providing balance. Below is an excerpt to the article by yours truly.

You might also like to read:

The dark side of opioid restrictions

In 2014, Florida began a severe crackdown on pain medicine. I encountered pharmacist technicians afraid to handle my prescriptions. They insisted I deal with the pharmacist in person, and even refused to tell me whether my prescription had refills. They refused to transfer a controlled prescription when I moved to another county, even though all my others were transferred.

There have been times others humiliated me in their attempt to comply with the law. One practice I had never visited before demanded I urinate in a cup upon arrival. I knew it was unwarranted because I had no prescriptions there, so I refused. Once I told an intrusive pharmacy technician, “You have no idea why I need that medicine. It’s not your role to approve or disapprove.”

Messages patients sent me corresponded to tragic stories on local television news about people living in terrible pain. People could no longer get their prescriptions from their doctors, but were forced to visit specific pain clinics, an added expense for people with chronic diseases who already pay high costs. Prescriptions were limited to 30 days, requiring additional visits for refills. Click here to keep reading Kelly’s article on opioid restrictions in the British Medical Journal.

Do opioid restrictions work?

My argument was simply that opioid restrictions often punish the wrong people. While several patient groups have spoken out against the recent prescription crackdowns, other institutions have begun to examine whether the opioid restrictions are actually effective.

The jury may still be out but doubts are being raised:

  • One story in the New England Journal of Medicine says they are not: “Adoption of controlled-substance laws was not associated with reductions in potentially hazardous use of opioids or overdose among disabled Medicare beneficiaries, a population particularly at risk.”
  • A paper discussed by the Cato Institute found Prescription Drug Monitoring Programs (PDMP’s) have “no statistically significant effect on a key medical outcome: opioid poisoning incidents.”
  • An in-depth article by Dr. Josh Bloom at American Council on Science and Health found one harmful result of opioid restrictions is an increase in heroin use, overdose, and death, according to NIH data. He also writes about suicide: “There is no question that many people have been impacted by their inability to get the drugs that they had used responsibly for years. Both individuals and organizations have called the new rules Draconian.”

Do people with rheumatoid disease really need pain medicine?

People with #rheum disease have repeated severe acute pain and legitimate need for pain medication. Click To TweetOn a personal note: Eleven years of full-blown RD and I still think I’m tough. I’ve survived five (long) home births with no pain relief; the nurse midwives don’t even allow a Tylenol or a sip of wine. I’ve lived with a bulging torn disc in my spine since age 20. Endured several radiofrequency ablations while awake. Three times I’ve had a fever of 105F. For years, I’ve watched one doctor and nurse after another marvel at how I sit and breathe while needles are put deep into my finger, wrist, shoulder, knee, ankle or toe joint, and I don’t flinch. I believe I have lived through enough kinds of pain to have a fair opinion of severe pain.

On rare occasions, I use opioid pain medications myself. So yes I’m biased toward patients and I’ve written over 60 articles on RD pain and pain tolerance.  And I believe that people with rheumatoid disease live with repeated severe acute pain and have legitimate need for pain medication that it is wrong to deny. Stay tuned for more on the topic of opioid restrictions.

WHAT DO YOU THINK? HAVE YOU ENCOUNTERED OPIOID RESTRICTIONS?

DO YOU THINK RESTRICTING PATIENTS’ ACCESS TO PAIN MEDICINE REDUCES MISUSE AND ADDICTION PROBLEMS?

Recommended reading

NOTE: Your comments are an important resource for future readers of this post in the months to come. Please find the comment link below each post.

Click here to read all the comments or add yours!

Kelly Young. All rights reserved.

This entry was posted on Tuesday, March 14th, 2017 at 11:50 pm and is filed under RA Education. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. Both comments and pings are currently closed.

Advertisement

The Post

Comments (19)


Would You Like Free Email Updates?
Stay in touch with RA Warrior.
We respect your privacy. Your email address will never be shared.